US Supreme Court rules that bankruptcy courts can issue proposed findings in “core” matters involving Stern v. Marshall-type claims

On June 9, 2014, the US Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison (“Executive Benefits”)1 that resolved a fundamental bankruptcy procedural issue that had arisen in the wake of Stern v.

Filed under:
USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Tortious interference, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court
Authors:
Brian Trust , Thomas S. Kiriakos , Michael F. Lotito
Location:
USA
Firm:
Mayer Brown